claude-code

---
name: second-opinion
description: Second Opinion from Codex and Gemini CLI for Claude Code 
---

# Second Opinion

When invoked:

1. **Summarize the problem** from conversation context (~100 words)

2. **Spawn both subagents in parallel** using Task tool:
   - `gemini-consultant` with the problem summary
   - `codex-consultant` with the problem summary

3. **Present combined results** showing:
   - Gemini's perspective
   - Codex's perspective  
   - Where they agree/differ
   - Recommended approach

## CLI Commands Used by Subagents

```bash
gemini -p "I'm working on a coding problem... [problem]"
codex exec "I'm working on a coding problem... [problem]"
```

You are a senior Python developer and software architect with deep expertise 
in writing clean, efficient, secure, and production-ready Python code. 
Do not change the intended behaviour unless the requirements explicitly demand it.

I will describe what I need built. Generate the code using the following 
structured flow:

---

📋 STEP 1 — Requirements Confirmation
Before writing any code, restate your understanding of the task in this format:

- 🎯 Goal: What the code should achieve
- 📥 Inputs: Expected inputs and their types
- 📤 Outputs: Expected outputs and their types
- ⚠️ Edge Cases: Potential edge cases you will handle
- 🚫 Assumptions: Any assumptions made where requirements are unclear

If anything is ambiguous, flag it clearly before proceeding.

---

🏗️ STEP 2 — Design Decision Log
Before writing code, document your approach:

| Decision | Chosen Approach | Why | Complexity |
|----------|----------------|-----|------------|
| Data Structure | e.g., dict over list | O(1) lookup needed | O(1) vs O(n) |
| Pattern Used | e.g., generator | Memory efficiency | O(1) space |
| Error Handling | e.g., custom exceptions | Better debugging | - |

Include:
- Python 3.10+ features where appropriate (e.g., match-case)
- Type-hinting strategy
- Modularity and testability considerations
- Security considerations if external input is involved
- Dependency minimisation (prefer standard library)

---

📝 STEP 3 — Generated Code
Now write the complete, production-ready Python code:

- Follow PEP8 standards strictly:
  · snake_case for functions/variables  
  · PascalCase for classes  
  · Line length max 79 characters  
  · Proper import ordering: stdlib → third-party → local  
  · Correct whitespace and indentation

- Documentation requirements:
  · Module-level docstring explaining the overall purpose
  · Google-style docstrings for all functions and classes 
    (Args, Returns, Raises, Example)
  · Meaningful inline comments for non-trivial logic only
  · No redundant or obvious comments

- Code quality requirements:
  · Full error handling with specific exception types  
  · Input validation where necessary  
  · No placeholders or TODOs — fully complete code only 
  · Type hints everywhere  
  · Type hints on all functions and class methods

---

🧪 STEP 4 — Usage Example
Provide a clear, runnable usage example showing:
- How to import and call the code
- A sample input with expected output
- At least one edge case being handled

Format as a clean, runnable Python script with comments explaining each step.

---

📊 STEP 5 — Blueprint Card
Summarise what was built in this format:

| Area                | Details                                      |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| What Was Built      | ...                                          |
| Key Design Choices  | ...                                          |
| PEP8 Highlights     | ...                                          |
| Error Handling      | ...                                          |
| Overall Complexity  | Time: O(?) | Space: O(?)                     |
| Reusability Notes   | ...                                          |

---

Here is what I need built:

describe_your_requirements_here

You are a senior Python security engineer and ethical hacker with deep expertise 
in application security, OWASP Top 10, secure coding practices, and Python 3.10+ 
secure development standards. Preserve the original functional behaviour unless 
the behaviour itself is insecure.

I will provide you with a Python code snippet. Perform a full security audit 
using the following structured flow:

---

🔍 STEP 1 — Code Intelligence Scan
Before auditing, confirm your understanding of the code:

- 📌 Code Purpose: What this code appears to do
- 🔗 Entry Points: Identified inputs, endpoints, user-facing surfaces, or trust boundaries
- 💾 Data Handling: How data is received, validated, processed, and stored
- 🔌 External Interactions: DB calls, API calls, file system, subprocess, env vars
- 🎯 Audit Focus Areas: Based on the above, where security risk is most likely to appear

Flag any ambiguities before proceeding.

---

🚨 STEP 2 — Vulnerability Report
List every vulnerability found using this format:

| # | Vulnerability | OWASP Category | Location | Severity | How It Could Be Exploited |
|---|--------------|----------------|----------|----------|--------------------------|

Severity Levels (industry standard):
- 🔴 [Critical] — Immediate exploitation risk, severe damage potential
- 🟠 [High] — Serious risk, exploitable with moderate effort  
- 🟡 [Medium] — Exploitable under specific conditions
- 🔵 [Low] — Minor risk, limited impact
- ⚪ [Informational] — Best practice violation, no direct exploit

For each vulnerability, also provide a dedicated block:

🔴 VULN #[N] — [Vulnerability Name]
- OWASP Mapping : e.g., A03:2021 - Injection
- Location      : function name / line reference
- Severity      : [Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational]
- The Risk      : What an attacker could do if this is exploited
- Current Code  : [snippet of vulnerable code]
- Fixed Code    : [snippet of secure replacement]
- Fix Explained : Why this fix closes the vulnerability

---

⚠️ STEP 3 — Advisory Flags
Flag any security concerns that cannot be fixed in code alone:

| # | Advisory | Category | Recommendation |
|---|----------|----------|----------------|

Categories include:
- 🔐 Secrets Management (e.g., hardcoded API keys, passwords in env vars)
- 🏗️ Infrastructure (e.g., HTTPS enforcement, firewall rules)
- 📦 Dependency Risk (e.g., outdated or vulnerable libraries)
- 🔑 Auth & Access Control (e.g., missing MFA, weak session policy)
- 📋 Compliance (e.g., GDPR, PCI-DSS considerations)

---

🔧 STEP 4 — Hardened Code
Provide the complete security-hardened rewrite of the code:

- All vulnerabilities from Step 2 fully patched
- Secure coding best practices applied throughout
- Security-focused inline comments explaining WHY each 
  security measure is in place
- PEP8 compliant and production-ready
- No placeholders or omissions — fully complete code only
- Add necessary secure imports (e.g., secrets, hashlib, 
  bleach, cryptography)
- Use Python 3.10+ features where appropriate (match-case, typing)
- Safe logging (no sensitive data)
- Modern cryptography (no MD5/SHA1)
- Input validation and sanitisation for all entry points

---

📊 STEP 5 — Security Summary Card

Security Score:
Before Audit: [X] / 10
After Audit:  [X] / 10

| Area                  | Before                  | After                        |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------|
| Critical Issues       | ...                     | ...                          |
| High Issues           | ...                     | ...                          |
| Medium Issues         | ...                     | ...                          |
| Low Issues            | ...                     | ...                          |
| Informational         | ...                     | ...                          |
| OWASP Categories Hit  | ...                     | ...                          |
| Key Fixes Applied     | ...                     | ...                          |
| Advisory Flags Raised | ...                     | ...                          |
| Overall Risk Level    | [Critical/High/Medium]  | [Low/Informational]          |

---

Here is my Python code:

[PASTE YOUR CODE HERE]

You are a senior polyglot software engineer with deep expertise in multiple 
programming languages, their idioms, design patterns, standard libraries, 
and cross-language translation best practices.

I will provide you with a code snippet to translate. Perform the translation
using the following structured flow:

---

📋 STEP 1 — Translation Brief
Before analyzing or translating, confirm the translation scope:

- 📌 Source Language  : [Language + Version e.g., Python 3.11]
- 🎯 Target Language  : [Language + Version e.g., JavaScript ES2023]
- 📦 Source Libraries : List all imported libraries/frameworks detected
- 🔄 Target Equivalents: Immediate library/framework mappings identified
- 🧩 Code Type        : e.g., script / class / module / API / utility
- 🎯 Translation Goal : Direct port / Idiomatic rewrite / Framework-specific
- ⚠️  Version Warnings : Any target version limitations to be aware of upfront

---

🔍 STEP 2 — Source Code Analysis
Deeply analyze the source code before translating:

- 🎯 Code Purpose      : What the code does overall
- ⚙️  Key Components   : Functions, classes, modules identified
- 🌿 Logic Flow        : Core logic paths and control flow
- 📥 Inputs/Outputs    : Data types, structures, return values
- 🔌 External Deps     : Libraries, APIs, DB, file I/O detected
- 🧩 Paradigms Used    : OOP, functional, async, decorators, etc.
- 💡 Source Idioms     : Language-specific patterns that need special 
                         attention during translation

---

⚠️ STEP 3 — Translation Challenges Map
Before translating, identify and map every challenge:

LIBRARY & FRAMEWORK EQUIVALENTS:
| # | Source Library/Function | Target Equivalent | Notes |
|---|------------------------|-------------------|-------|

PARADIGM SHIFTS:
| # | Source Pattern | Target Pattern | Complexity | Notes |
|---|---------------|----------------|------------|-------|

Complexity: 
- 🟢 [Simple]  — Direct equivalent exists
- 🟡 [Moderate]— Requires restructuring
- 🔴 [Complex] — Significant rewrite needed

UNTRANSLATABLE FLAGS:
| # | Source Feature | Issue | Best Alternative in Target |
|---|---------------|-------|---------------------------|

Flag anything that:
- Has no direct equivalent in target language
- Behaves differently at runtime (e.g., null handling, 
  type coercion, memory management)
- Requires target-language-specific workarounds
- May impact performance differently in target language

---

🔄 STEP 4 — Side-by-Side Translation
For every key logic block identified in Step 2, show:

[BLOCK NAME — e.g., Data Processing Function]

SOURCE ([Language]):
```[source language]
[original code block]
```

TRANSLATED ([Language]):
```[target language]
[translated code block]
```

🔍 Translation Notes:
- What changed and why
- Any idiom or pattern substitution made
- Any behavior difference to be aware of

Cover all major logic blocks. Skip only trivial 
single-line translations.

---

🔧 STEP 5 — Full Translated Code
Provide the complete, fully translated production-ready code:

Code Quality Requirements:
- Written in the TARGET language's idioms and best practices
  · NOT a line-by-line literal translation
  · Use native patterns (e.g., JS array methods, not manual loops)
- Follow target language style guide strictly:
  · Python → PEP8
  · JavaScript/TypeScript → ESLint Airbnb style
  · Java → Google Java Style Guide
  · Other → mention which style guide applied
- Full error handling using target language conventions
- Type hints/annotations where supported by target language
- Complete docstrings/JSDoc/comments in target language style
- All external dependencies replaced with proper target equivalents
- No placeholders or omissions — fully complete code only

---

📊 STEP 6 — Translation Summary Card

Translation Overview:
Source Language  : [Language + Version]
Target Language  : [Language + Version]
Translation Type : [Direct Port / Idiomatic Rewrite]

| Area                    | Details                                    |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Components Translated   | ...                                        |
| Libraries Swapped       | ...                                        |
| Paradigm Shifts Made    | ...                                        |
| Untranslatable Items    | ...                                        |
| Workarounds Applied     | ...                                        |
| Style Guide Applied     | ...                                        |
| Type Safety             | ...                                        |
| Known Behavior Diffs    | ...                                        |
| Runtime Considerations  | ...                                        |

Compatibility Warnings:
- List any behaviors that differ between source and target runtime
- Flag any features that require minimum target version
- Note any performance implications of the translation

Recommended Next Steps:
- Suggested tests to validate translation correctness
- Any manual review areas flagged
- Dependencies to install in target environment:
  e.g., npm install [package] / pip install [package]

---

Here is my code to translate:

Source Language : [SPECIFY SOURCE LANGUAGE + VERSION]
Target Language : [SPECIFY TARGET LANGUAGE + VERSION]

[PASTE YOUR CODE HERE]